Redefining Luxury: The New Leadership of Care

Introduction: The Invisible Architecture

Every estate possesses two architectures: one built of marble and steel, the other of trust and care. The first is visible, designed by architects and artisans; the second is invisible, constructed daily by those who serve, sense, and steward. Within this unseen structure, true luxury resides—and it is here that leadership is tested.

In ultra–high-net-worth environments, the visible architecture is breathtaking, yet what sustains harmony is the emotional infrastructure: the way people anticipate, respond, and align with one another in service of dignity. This insight echoes a central challenge in the scholarship. Heyes (2021) observes that luxury hospitality still lacks a unified definition and that its lived meaning emerges at the intersection of tangible and intangible elements. He cautions that more, or even better, does not automatically produce luxury, particularly as sustainability concerns intensify (Heyes, 2021).

A recent systematic review reinforces this observation. Research in luxury hospitality consistently converges on two essential threads: tangible encounter attributes and the emotional, intangible elements that shape experience and value. Scholars emphasize the need for stronger theoretical integration and clearer research agendas. The redefinition of luxury as care and leadership as the stewardship of emotion aligns directly with this emerging frontier (Jain et al., 2023).

1) Emotional Labor as Leadership Competence

There is a moment in every service leader’s career when the meaning of professionalism changes. It does not arrive with a flawless gala or a perfectly executed schedule, but in something smaller and quieter—a staff member sensing that a guest needs stillness rather than conversation, placing a cup of tea within reach, and then stepping back. The porcelain matters less than the timing; presence carries the value. That is luxury as care, and it is built through emotional work.

This is where leadership and emotional labor converge, and redefining luxury through leadership and care transforms service into stewardship. Contemporary tests of the Emotion-as-Social-Information (EASI) perspective demonstrate that leaders’ emotional display strategies shape employees’ own emotion regulation. When leaders engage in deep acting—aligning authentic feeling with expression—teams respond with trust and congruent emotional effort. When leaders rely on surface acting, perceived inauthenticity erodes credibility and psychological safety. In short, the leader’s emotion regulation becomes social information that guides the team’s relational posture (Tang et al., 2024).

Redefining Luxury: The New Leadership of Care

Authentic leadership research connects these findings to performance. One study reveals that authentic leadership fosters affective commitment, which in turn supports creativity and individual performance (Duarte et al., 2021). Another demonstrates that authentic leadership improves task performance through psychological capital (Jang et al., 2022). Together, this evidence positions emotional intelligence and authenticity not as “soft” skills but as core leadership competencies with measurable outcomes.

For UHNW estates, this is not abstract—it is operational. The estate manager’s tone at morning briefings, cadence during transitions, and presence in difficult moments become cues for the team’s own emotion work. High-quality care is not merely technical execution; it is the disciplined practice of emotional congruence in settings where discretion is non-negotiable and the relationship itself is the medium of work. Recent reviews of emotional intelligence in teams confirm that collective performance strengthens when leaders perceive, understand, and regulate affect across the system (Coronado-Maldonado & Marqués-Sánchez, 2023).

2) Recasting Luxury: From Possession to Presence

Once, luxury was measured by accumulation. In 2025, the luxury that resonates is mindful, place-attuned, and relational. Scholars now document the evolution from opulence to meaning, showing that modern luxury consumers evaluate value in terms of self-congruity and identity alignment. For global hotel brands, a personality that mirrors the guest’s self-image predicts stronger satisfaction and loyalty (Kim, 2023).

Heyes’s (2021) argument anchors this pivot: luxury is created through the interplay of tangible and intangible components, and growth in tangibles without a commensurate experience of care fails to cross the threshold into true luxury. He calls for a more scientific understanding of how the intangible is designed and sustained—a call this essay answers by asserting that it is the social design of care that consistently produces luxury in lived experience.

The mindful-luxury lens extends this point. Research in tourism management demonstrates how luxury can prioritize intentionality, community, and environmental sensitivity without compromising exclusivity or sophistication (Leban et al., 2024). This bridge to estate contexts is powerful, where privacy, conservation, and wellness often matter as much as culinary or design prestige.

3) Care Under Pressure: Leadership in the Intimate Infrastructure

Luxury reveals itself most clearly when something goes wrong. Consider a severe weather event that compromises power, logistics, and safety minutes before guests arrive. In those moments, crystal and couture recede; the room watches the leader. Voice, stance, and eye contact become the instruments that restore order and protect dignity. The work is operational—but it is also an emotional stewardship.

Recent evidence clarifies this mechanism. Studies using an affective-events framework demonstrate that leader emotion directly influences employees’ emotional states, which in turn predict job performance. Positive, authentically regulated displays increase followers’ affect and performance. Teams absorb the leader’s regulation as usable information about what to feel and how to proceed (Wan et al., 2022).

In UHNW estates, this dynamic is magnified by proximity and discretion. There is no front-desk buffer; the work is relational and continuous. Boundaries between household, sanctuary, and workplace blur in crises. The leader’s goal is not control but the regulation of the emotional field so people can think clearly and act in concert. The definition of luxury as care is stress-tested here—and found to be strategic, not sentimental.

4) The Architecture of Care: Redefining Systems That Sustain Emotion

Years ago, a mentor told me, “Luxury is what you do not see.” At first, I understood that as discretion. With experience, I recognized a more profound lesson: true refinement resides in systems that make care feel effortless to the receiver and sustainable to the team. The guest never senses the choreography, yet every gesture lands with precision.

Designing that choreography is leadership—and it is an organizational task. What appears as intuition is often the product of disciplined routines that translate values into practice. Consider four examples worthy of any estate playbook:

1. Emotional handoff rituals. At each staff transition, a two-minute briefing conveys subtle cues about mood, energy, and context.

2. Quiet sanctuaries. A designated space where staff can reset for five minutes after emotionally charged interactions, preserving composure without stigma.

3. Reflective briefings. A weekly meeting pairing logistics with a short check on team capacity and unspoken friction before it becomes visible.

4. Cross-training for perspective. Short rotations that allow staff to shadow allied roles, building empathy for constraints across the system.

   
   

These are not “soft” practices; they constitute a relational infrastructure that supports quality, reliability, and retention. Research confirms that when leaders invest in relational coordination, workers experience greater well-being, stronger control over time, and higher resilience during disruption (Ali et al., 2022). Such findings provide empirical grounding for the claim that care can—and should—be operationalized.

This architecture also depends on psychological safety. When team members feel confident voicing concerns or misalignments without fear, quality improves. Reviews from 2022 and 2024 consolidate two decades of research and measurement practice, offering leaders concrete levers such as coaching behaviors, learning routines, and climate audits (Li et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2024). For estate teams operating under intense discretion and pressure, psychological safety is not a luxury; it is the climate that makes excellence repeatable.

5) Redefining Luxury: Stewardship and Authentic Leadership

Stewardship is an ethic of leadership suited to the intimacy of estate work—an authority expressed through guardianship of people and culture. Authentic leadership aligns naturally with stewardship, emphasizing self-awareness, relational transparency, and moral grounding that places dignity at its center. Evidence shows that authentic leadership enhances affective commitment and creativity (Duarte et al., 2021) and improves task performance by cultivating psychological resources such as hope and efficacy (Jang et al., 2022). In short, leaders who regulate themselves and speak truthfully make others stronger and more capable.

This has practical implications for selection, training, and succession. Estate leaders should be recruited for emotional intelligence and coached in display rules that prize deep acting over surface acting. Teams benefit from training in emotional-cue interpretation and rituals that convert empathy into system reliability. And because estates depend on continuity, the stewardship model demands codification: if the manager departs, the care culture must remain.

A complementary 2024 study found that leaders’ beliefs about the usefulness of emotion shape employees’ emotional competence and relationship quality. Leaders who treat emotion as an informative resource—rather than something to suppress—reduce relational conflict and foster healthier climates (Park & Park, 2024). This aligns with the argument that care is not sentimentality but disciplined attention expressed through structure.

6) UHNW Application: Designing for Difference

Luxury guests are not monolithic. A 2024 segmentation study of five-star-hotel customers identifies distinct benefit clusters, including ethical and symbolic benefits alongside traditional social and experiential drivers (Mele et al., 2024). Research on mindful luxury similarly shows that intentional, place-specific experiences can be more compelling than conspicuous ones (Leban et al., 2024). For estate leadership, these findings justify a shift from generic service standards to principled personalization—approaches that protect privacy while aligning with conservation and wellness priorities.

This is where Heyes’s (2021) call for scientific understanding becomes actionable. Recognizing that luxury is produced at the intersection of tangible and intangible allows estate leaders to design that intersection intentionally. The task is to translate empathy into structure—and structure back into empathy—so that care remains consistent without becoming mechanical.

In the world’s most refined households, silence speaks volumes. It is the pause before a guest’s unspoken need, the stillness that precedes a gracious act. Genuine luxury lives in these intervals—not in chandeliers or silver, but in care that anticipates without intrusion.

The New Leadership of Care: The Paradox of Silence

If luxury resists a single definition because it is personal and contextual, it is best understood as a leadership practice. In estate environments, leadership is less about directing people and more about curating harmony among people, space, and spirit. The unseen architecture of service—built through empathy, authenticity, and ethical design—sustains not only operational excellence but human dignity. Luxury is not excess; it is empathy refined, delivered through systems that hold everyone in the room.

References

Ali, H. N., Gittell, J. H., Deng, A., Stults, C., Martinez, M., Perstch, M., Weger, J., & Dillon, A. (2022). Relationships and resilience at work and at home: Impact of relational coordination on clinician work–life balance and well-being in times of crisis. Health Care Management Review, 47(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000325

Coronado-Maldonado, I., & Marqués-Sánchez, P. (2023). Emotional intelligence, leadership, and work teams: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1182903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1182903

Dong, R. K., Leka, S., & Jain, A. (2024). Psychological safety and psychosocial safety climate in the workplace: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review, 2000 to 2023. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 147, 103959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103959

Duarte, A. P., Ribeiro, N., Semedo, A. S., & Gomes, D. R. (2021). Authentic leadership and improved individual performance: Affective commitment and creativity as sequential mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 675749. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675749

Heyes, A. (2021). What is luxury hospitality? A need to move towards a scientific understanding. Research in Hospitality Management, 11(2), 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2021.1917919

Jain, V., Wirtz, J., Salunke, P., Nunkoo, R., & Sharma, A. (2023). Luxury hospitality: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 115, 103597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103597

Jang, E., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2022). Authentic leadership and task performance via psychological capital: A multilevel mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 722214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.722214

Kim, J. J. (2023). Brand personality of global chain hotels, self-congruity, and self-discrepancy on customer responses. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114, 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103565

Leban, M., Dubosson, M., & Schegg, R. (2024). Mindful luxury: A case of the Faroe Islands. Tourism Management, 98, 104850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104850

Li, T., Ling, W., & Ji, M. (2022). A multilevel mediation model of psychological safety: The role of inclusive leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 934831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934831

Mele, E., Dubosson, M., & Schegg, R. (2024). Are all luxury guests the same? A benefit segmentation of five-star hotel customers. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 8(11), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-10-2022-0309

Park, J. S., & Park, S. (2024). Leaders’ beliefs about the usefulness of emotions and team outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1352590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352590

Tang, X., Zhang, X., & Liu, J. (2024). Influence of leaders’ emotional labor and its perceived appropriateness on employees’ emotional labor: An EASI perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050179

Wan, J., Chen, X., & Shi, M. (2022). The impact of emotional leadership on subordinates’ job performance: The mediating role of positive emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 917287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917287

______________________________________________________________________________________

Jennifer Laurence is the founder and president of Luxury Lifestyle Logistics, a leading estate management consulting firm renowned for elevating service standards in ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) luxury residential estates. With over 25 years of distinguished experience in hospitality and private service, she is a trusted authority in estate operations, specializing in optimizing household workflows, developing bespoke service protocols, and cultivating high-performing teams. Jennifer advises estate owners, family offices, and private service professionals on staff training, leadership development, conflict resolution, and guiding estates and luxury hospitality environments through organizational change and service culture creation. As a Doctoral Candidate in Organizational Leadership, she blends academic research with hands-on estate hospitality expertise, uniquely positioning her to drive operational excellence and foster collaborative, results-oriented estate teams. As Principal Liaison Director for the Private Service Alliance, she actively contributes to industry advocacy, thought leadership, and best practices. Her insight ensures that every facet of estate management—from daily service delivery to long-term operational strategy—meets the highest standards of precision, discretion, and sophistication for the families she serves. 

📍 Website: Luxury Lifestyle Logistics

📍 LinkedIn: Jennifer Laurence